Jim, why did you object to me quoting historians who disagreed with you?
What have we been arguing about all this time?

You did not want any other view expressed but yours!

You did not accept that that your view is disputed.
You still refuse to accept that your so called "facts" are disputed.

There is no post from you acknowledging that your views are disputed by historians until yesterday.
If that is not true, produce one.
Good luck with that Jim.