Well, if that's your idea of 'gleeful revelling', Jim, then I feel bound to say that I don't think you'd recognise a gleeful revel if it crep' up behind you and bit you on the bum. Why, if really pushed even a miserable old sod like me could revel a bit more gleefully than just reproducing a few undisputed statistics*, which is all Ake has been doing. But as they are statistics that unhappily do not confirm the prejudices of your old Mind·made·up·no·facts·please Brigade, you somehow purport to see them as gleeful revelling, and fall back on the weary old copout of the Shoot·The·Messenger routine.!

Best
≈M≈

≤small>*none of you lot over there has made any coherent attempt to dispute them anyhow that anyone can see