A wordy post from shimrod evidencing nothing except his opinion . I fear.                           Bill, once again I find that you seem to not quite read me, and maybe I am not precise enough.   Whilst I do take the bible as evidence for myself , it should be obvious by now, that I do not use that in defending creationism here. You also still don't seem to see what I mean by interpretation of evidence. If you dig up a fossil.....that is the data, when you assess the age, your presuppositions and worldview influence your finding. I have afore provided quotes from evolutionary scientists admitting this. When you see strata layered, I say it was laid down by the flood, whereas you might say it was deposited over millions or yr...... You imply that creation scientists search for evidence to overturn the evolutionary paradigm , as though evolution believers don't try to do the same ! Well of course creation believers will find the gaping flaws in evolutionism.....the question is, can you answer them.   The evolutionary paradigm may be most believed by most scientists, but if that had been that's that then , in history, we would,nt have made much progress.