There is a vast chasm of difference between an explanation that can never be explained and one that, though it has yet to yield up its secrets, is at least vulnerable to scientific enquiry. Actually, God SHOULD be very vulnerable to scientific enquiry, though his advocates ardently try to keep him from it. Sadly for him, the enquiry may conclude that, due to lack of any evidence, he almost certainly doesn't exist. And I'm afraid I don't swallow such arcane concepts as mindless universes. I like to keep me feet on the ground if I can, not even on turtles' backs. Science does it best for me. It's sheer joy, in fact, as un-Spocklike as can be.