"Why so nasty to MGM, Richard?" asked Al, 9 posts above.

I'll tell you why, Al, since he hasn't; & won't. It's because, ·#1·, he is a spiteful bit of work altogether -- just look at his overall attitude to any sort of opposition.; &, in particular, ·#2·, he knows that I see thru the patronising nature of his trendy leftyism. He doesn't give a bugger for equality, & the Rights·Of·Man & all that caper: he just thinks that being a middle-class lefty is a right-on earnest of ❤·in·right·placery -- what the excellent Rod Liddle in this week's Spectator sums up as "virtue-signalling". How many members of the working class does he actually number among his acquaintance, I wonder, as he pursues his uncontrovertably upper-to- upper-middle-class profession? And, as he doesn't like being seen thru, he goes on getting at me as a form of defensive aggression. As if I should give a flying one what he thinks of me anyhow -- especially since I have pretty well given up reading his boring posts at that.

That answer your question?

Best regards

≈M≈