That's a lot of primary premises in there bill !. They are just the opposite ones to mine. How do you know there was not enough water below to augment that from above. I know because it is in the narrative that waters come from below. And though I don't have the ref to hand I seem to remember that traces of water was found locked in deep rocks. As usual, don't prove the flood but just maybe consistent with it......what a shame for evolutionism believers that so much of observable science is such a challenge to the paradigm!.   Yes, there is not enough water to cover the ....current...high mountains, but as you know, they were not always so high, which is why marine fossils are found on them so often !. If you read to the article you linked to, you will see how dr Morris' explains it.    You can't just toss in bad science to correct unsupported ideology !   To turn your remarks on their head !.