I think that you're missing the point, Keith A!

Pete constantly makes statements like: "It is an observable scientific principle that life only comes from life." The boldness of such statements suggests that he views himself as some sort of authority. But when you look closely at most of the stuff he writes, it soon becomes obvious that it derives from the website 'Creation.com' and his literal interpretation of biblical texts. I strongly believe that if he wishes to pose as an authority he has to look beyond those two dubious sources.
The purpose of my last post was to challenge Pete to read more widely and to consider all of the available evidence. You've gone and ruined it now - thanks a bunch!!