" her involvement in the Libya debacle and her guilt over the Benghazi issue."

You need to give up that crap, Ake... those are subjective opinions, not facts. I do not care how much you have read about Libya & Benghazi, NONE of 7-8 'investigations' have shown that she deserves blame for causing anything. (I saw a LONG interview with the CIA officer [on the Charlie Rose TV program] who was on duty during Benghazi and followed the events in real time. He stated plainly how it developed and answered all relevant questions about what was done. If the only claim it that the embassy building 'should' have had more protection... that is easy in retrospect, but they had all they asked for, and Benghazi was did not even have the formal status of an 'embassy'.

   Ms. Clinton was responsible for a couple of hundred places, and her diplomatic credentials were well respected among the diplomats who depended on her. Sad events and terror are not automatically the 'fault' of the person in charge!