Oh frustration.....I typed a detailed response to you previous post , bill , but lost it ! But the main point was that your lengthy post really amounted to relying on consensus science.....and that is not scientific, it is following the herd. On to last post. So acorn worms share a percentage of genes with humans. Do you suppose that God should have used something else ? What we have is a measure of correlation , not an explanation of how the evolution bush developed. Did,nt we have all this with apes and humans , but when more data came to light , the greater detail revealed far more difference than first suggested.