Teribus is more interested in who is writing rather than what they write. What's up? You don't need to get concerned about a cookie in order to clarify the bullshit you keep spewing.

Oh gosh. All the historians seem to agree with Sheffield's conclusions so why be bothered with the conclusion of someone else given the same evidence? I don't know what, if anything Keith A of Hertford does for a living but I hope it isn't being a teacher or lecturer. First off I doubt "they" do, not that there is a "they" to make such a silly claim from and secondly, Sheffield himself has published various conclusions at different times. He's a historian not a god botherer.

Eeh, it's worth coming on here just to tour the cages and give them the odd rattle when the zoo keeper isn't looking.