Jim does get confused on many subjects but on this, even his little mistakes

Claiming that a current writer of reviews saw active service in WW1 is more than a little mistake.
It shows how tenuous is his grasp of reality, never mind history.

Something else that was more than a little mistake.
He said I had referred to David Crane as one of the historians agreeing my views.
Entirely made up. A blatant lie.
How could I quote him when he has written nothing on WW!!?

Google shows his only previous mention was a year ago when Jim last produced that same shit review.