"I do not believe that I make comments in a sneery manner."
You wrote this
"his is how you have always abused history, trying to manipulate it in order fit your version pf things. But you have no credibility on the subject of history as your posts on this thread clearly show.
Being critical of what you refer you as " our betters" is not the problem Jim. The problem is your ignoring of any facts that do not support your agenda."
It is both sneery and grossly inaccurate - I have never at any time "abused history", though I may have been wrong and when it is pointed out, have been happy to be corrected.
I leave the abusing of history to those who don't read, have admitted that they don't and are not even interested in the subject at hand, yet persist in their arguments.
Happy to respond to any examples of my "abusing" history if you care to provide them though
In my opinion, Thatcher and her abuse of democracy is relevant to a discussion on a statesmen who showed the same disregard for peoples' rights
Jim Carroll