Ah, OK, teribums. So, you have no qualifications to make such judgements yet you deem someone else's take on the study of history the 'biggest load of bollocks' that you have read for some time. Have you any grounds for believing that modette may be lying or is it just because his or her view does not fit in with your preconceptions? I guess we all know the value of your judgements anyway so I don't really expect a reasonable answer.