I don't drop in too often but it seems worth it, anything to brighten up my day.

Skimming through, am I dreaming or is Keith advocating a set of rules for armed conflict as employing some of the best minds?

Call me thick, but the only minds worth mentioning would be those trying to avoid such things in the first place?

Even if you take it at face value, nobody seems to have given a copy to either Israeli or Palestinian militants. Neither suicide bombers in crowded buses or soldiers aiming machine guns at stone throwing children come under rules by any sane mind. There again, neither do any of the tactics employed in an adjecant thread discussing 100 years ago. Yet the same mindset on this thread is evident on that one. Oh, I get it now....