"But still, you could find nothing written in twenty years that agrees with your old beliefs, but I posted many historians who called them myths."
The pills Keith - the pills!!
"Yes, and "eye witness" reports of bodies trucked away, but it was all lies."
Doesn't make any difference that, with its record of terrorism and rigging its enquiries Israel is not to be trusted - we saw Israel's terrorist activities and yet iy#t declared itself not guilty on the grunds of a rigged enquiry - never again
"The Redmond Enquiry found Israel guilty either "directly or indirectly" of the Sabra/Shatila massacre - guilty as that"
Hate to be the bearer of bad news but whatever way you read it - that's guilty one way or another.
Israel facilitated the massacre - it provided transport for the killers, opened the gates for them and left them at it for three days - it even provided illumination so they could continue their slaughter through the night.
When the slaughter was over they drove the killers away, provided bulldozers to conceal the dead and eventually built a stadium over the mass graves.
Eye witnesses swore that soldiers stood by while the killing was taking place and refused to help.
Every bit of this was covered by the Redmond enquiry and/or eye-witness statements (including from Israeli soldiers on the ground - the experiences of one of them was made into a film. It was established beyond doubt - the only bit Redmond didn't establish was Israel's possible hands-on involvement and that's far from unreasonable given their record of slaughter
To add icing to the cake, the man held as being overall responsible was made Prime Minister - talk about rubbing the world's nose in it - you'd think they believed they had God on their side - oh, some of them do, don't they?
Now, which part of that is "not guilty"?
We really are done here Keith - you are trying to appease too many atrocities at the one time.
Sit back and drink your cocoa and maybe I'll read you a story before you go to bed.
Jim Carroll