Akenaton: "I suppose it will all boil down to electability....the scourge of democracy. Some day we will be forced to adopt socialist politics and conservative social policies, but that day is far off and we are still fooled by the illusion of equality provided by sexual and gender politics......toys of the all powerful media."


GUEST,#" '. . . toys of the all powerful media."


Ain't we all, Ake, ain't we all.'"

Yes...and who owns the media?? Who votes for their CEO's?

That being said, it seems obvious that the two critical candidates, who are 'upsetting the apple cart' are Trump and Sanders...who both APPEAR to be 'insurgent candidates'...in other words distancing themselves from what APPEARS to be the 'establishment'....(Gosh, it wasn't too long ago I referred to a lot of you, for being co-opted by, and becoming the very 'establishment' that you APPEAR to oppose!!).
We should, by now, know that Washington politicians represent the 'special interest' lobbies, and not even the people who voted for them, and that again, is BOTH parties.

Sanders, if you remember, was not really a 'Democrat', but rather an Independent, socialist, who decided to run as a Democrat...and seems to be gaining, quite a bit, being as Hillary's deceptions, corruption
and 'character' are causing her to crash and burn.

Trump, on the other hand, is an out front capitalist, corporate owner, and quasi celebrity.
Neither the Democrat 'establishment' nor the Republican' establishment' seem to want to 'embrace' either of these guys...Reason?
Possibly neither are 'owned' by the same 'owners' that they themselves are....even though, they APPEAR to have completely opposite financial ideologies....and in a way, it's VERY telling of how the two main parties are 'coming together', to combat their perceived threat. There is even talk of Dems crossing over to vote for Trump, IF Sanders were nominated....(Those are the 'establishment Democrats' to whom I am referring).

NOW, (and with all the mega-corporate money behind them) either or both parties, go to a brokered conventions, to run someone besides these two, either Sanders or Trump or both, could still run, but as Independents...then the election would boil down to a Capitalist vs a Socialist vs a Democrat corporate crony vs a Republican corporate crony....All while the corporate owned media 'provides' the narrative for you to blather on and on about it all.

I think the Obama administration is biding their time on Hillary, and don't expect much legal action on her till the results come in on the upcoming primary elections. I think they would rather see Biden run, over Clinton....so, I wouldn't be too surprised to see Hillary finally get indicted, or 'decide not to run for family or health reasons' to avoid prosecution..which would also implicate Bill and a host of other political, corporate and foreign luminaries!!....and I am sure that negotiations or plea bargainings are going on now...and possibly for quite some time....SO, possibly this election cycle may have four or five top candidates...one each from the 'establishment parties', Trump and Sanders, plus maybe someone else who may pop up.

I'm sure the 'media' will do it's best, in co-operating with the establishment parties, to keep you stupid....nor will we ever know the extent of what the FBI finds out, in regards to all the corruption uncovered from Hillary's involvements in influence trading.

GfS

Hey, olddude, you said that the Clintons were your friends, and that you expected to go to the White House if she was elected...you've also made it very clear that you are a Christian.....friends don't let friends drive drunk... lie their asses off, nor commit treason.
As Dylan sang, "You've got to serve somebody.....".