Now just in case someone here whose posts I don't read mentions the writings of Josephus, both Josephus and Tacitus were writing long after the alleged death of Jesus. Their works certainly wouldn't pass the Keith A. test of historical authenticity, as they were references way longer than 30 years max after the event and their works are not generally available in bookshops (except in dodgy compilations, of course). In fact, considerable controversy surrounds their integrity. What is far more striking is that, apart from the one dubious Tacitus reference, there is no mention of a chap called Jesus in any Roman writings, rather odd considering that there are huge volumes of such and that 'twas the Romans who supposedly put this troublesome insurgent to death. Still, he either existed or he didn't, and taking your pick is the only option. A few things are rock-solid certain, however. He was not born to a virgin. He did not turn water into wine. He did not raise people from the dead. He did not walk on water or feed thousands on five loaves and two fishes. He did not die and then come back to life. I'm fine with everything else, honest I am. That's because I'm a grown-up.