I don't present definitions of your religion or anyone else's. You characterise your own faith in your own way and that is what I go on. Whatever diversionary tactics you wish to employ, it still comes down to a belief system that is, to rational people who base their notions on evidence and reason, delusional and completely inadequate for explaining anything, let alone revealing of what is really true. You can't help that. It doesn't matter what version of God appeals to you most. The problem is with God, not the version. It isn't the different theistic perspectives that are the sticking point. It's the fact that they are theistic. To me, theistic equals invalid. Why? Because I want the evidence that you haven't got. Note, that you haven't got, not what you can't provide or articulate. You simply haven't got it.