Steve, I had already quoted the separate words of dismissal he used to rubbish them.
I did not change the meaning.
He rubbished and dismissed them both, as I did, and endorsed the findings of current historians, as I do.

His whole article endorsed the case I was making.
I had no need to misrepresent him, and I did not.

And that was in 2014, and its all you can put up against me.
My reputation is intact Steve.
Your accusation, "we often find we can't believe a word you say." can not be substantiated, like so many assertions you make.