Jim, I stand by my description of your post.
Do you deny that you merged a Wiki paste with your own text without quotes or accreditation?
If you do you are revealed as a liar.

Richard, you have chosen not to defend what appears to be an antisemitic claim that those board members had a "vested interest" in broadening the definition of antisemitism to gain more "influence."

Such a statement would lead to your expulsion from Labour if you were a member.

Richard,
hates the fact that the Times of Israel exposes that the EUMC definition has been discarded

I think that is just me.
I do not hate the fact of ToI report, I just point out that there has been no change to reflect that on the EUMC site.

If it has been discarded, how would anyone know?
Few read the ToI after all.
I don't.