No Greg, that is the only example, and it there is no dishonesty in it.
Steve,
It just so happened that I'd read that Guardian article just before Keith misrepresented it so grossly.

And it just so happened that I had quoted the disputed passage in full, and provided a link to the whole article.

Rag,
When one contributor claims from the rooftops that there are 3 criticisms of a book when in reality is in fact one criticism of a book, which that contributor then claims to be criticisms of that author works, it has to be pointed out.

Your accusation about me is mistaken Rag.
Here is what I actually said,
"So three examples given of all the Irish historians who criticise his work."

I did not, and do not lie.

Jim,
"Jim's knowledge has been shown to be wrong"
Where and by whom

Jim, you denied that the Home Rule Act had been passed
I showed that you were wrong.

You also challenged the fact that the people supported British forces not the rebels.
I showed that you were wrong.

You have not put up a single historian to back your case,

yes I have.

you have refused to respond to and of the points made other than to repeat your inaccuracies.

If that is true, say what these points are and I will answer them.
I have asked you to do this many times.
What stops you Jim?