The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #45911   Message #3792788
Posted By: Jim Carroll
30-May-16 - 07:28 AM
Thread Name: BS: Easter Rising - April 24-29, 1916
Subject: RE: BS: Easter Rising - April 24-29, 1916
For crying out loud Keith - you have substantiated none of the assertions you have made and have blatantly ignored requests to do.
Like Teribus - your assertions are your own - opinions backed with nothing - even your "real historians" have let you down.
If ou have any evidence of your opinions - back them up with documented facts (Jesuit lecturers of philosophy don't count)
I've put this up three times now (it refers to your ongoing repetition of what may have once been a mistake on your par but has now become a deliberate untruth.

"Agreement to wait till after the war to decide on the position on partition - For the sake of not having to repeat this again what problem do you have with that statement?
"Home Rule was not discussed again until after the Rising."
It was never "discussede" after the Rising - Lloyd George had gone ahead with making partition permanent - For the sake of not having to repeat this again what problem do you have with that statement
Redmond had made it cleared from the beginning that permanent partition was not on the table as far as his party was concerned - For the sake of not having to repeat this again what problem do you have with that statement?
"So no guarantee of permanent partition then"
Are you suggesting that Lloyd did not tell both sides that partition had been decided in their favour - For the sake of not having to repeat this again what problem do you have with that statement?   
"NOT the same thing at all."
Certainly not the same he had told the Unionists if that's what you mean, though I'm sure you don't - For the sake of not having to repeat this again what problem do you have with that statement?"
Until you square thisw circle with evidence, your assertions are no more than dishonest repetition.
I have no intention of wasting time on a pair of anachronistic post Imperial loonies, but I would be grateful for any genuine information - I've shown you mine (which you have consistently ignored, ot in the case of your mate, ruled immaterial, - now - where's yours?
I have a great deal more here ready to post so, if you don't like the heat, get out of the kitchen - some people take this subject seriously
Jim Carroll