There was Seth, but regression/reincarnation is not the tree I am barking up.

Is there any conscious indicator in such an unintuitive notion that advanced math indicates may be at the core of existence?
The probability that all possible outcomes actually exist somewhere/when in the multiverse has no direct evidence that I m aware. What about in dreams or experiential modes?

Quantum mechanics math points to a validity to every possibility happening. Maybe this math is an artifact of something else in play we have yet to conceive. Maybe sensing this strange effect does not exist.

A theory may not be mechanistic at its core but our reliance upon a mechanistic language that r Maybe this math is just n artifact educes some concepts to gear like synchronization or flawed similes.
For the sake of comprehension we often sacrifice vector concepts that defy mechanistic description.
So we use math to limits where it too begins to fail.

Dr. Feynman used his own symbols to advance new ideas.
Genius savants report that they obtain answers to complex math with thought shapes of various shapes and colors
that they then consciously translate back to numbers at the end of computation.

Anyway having a strange experience should not be considered a dangerous thing to share. We all dream.

The brain has the capacity to be influenced on the quantum level.
Maybe it has sensory apparatus to be aware of this influence.

Oh well its just an idea.