The gathering of statistical evidence of the amount of toxins, heavy metals and radiation exposure is not measured by little angel and devils on our shoulders. Additionally the level of harm assessment is not done by papal decree.

If you want to divide technology from science that merely confuses the issue.

The use of these statistics is more of a policy question once you plug the meticulous findings into what is called a 'Risk/Benefit assessment'.

DmcG For me to be speaking to people with religious training and bias and science PhD's requires two separate languages. It is impressive how well your language spans the gap between the two.

I would be the first to exclaim there is an urgent need for a belter moral imagination particularly among 'for profit exploitations' of our planet, our biome and our people.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1084045/