"You have been supporting or excusing the arming of Assad for as long as I can remember, as has your little friend which confirms your fascism"

The last bit of that mystifies me somewhat, but I certainly have not been supporting arming Assad at all. Please produce proof that I have if you can.

You on the other hand claimed that the UK was supplying arms to Assad - both Keith A and myself asked you for proof of that - proof that you could not deliver. Now could you explain to everybody on this forum how on earth us asking you that question constitutes "support" for Assad?

By the way you never did get back to us how 7.62mm x 51 ammunition would fit into weapons that fire 7.62mm x 39 rounds.

Found that passage in the Amnesty International Report that states that equipment supplied by the UK was used to torture prisoners in Syria?

Property in London owned by Bashir-al Assad amounts to what? I take it in grabbing all this property you want the UK to respect the rule of law? Or is it the usual "One law for the Goose and another for the Gander" approach of a gangster? You see unless Bashir-al Assad's name is on the title deeds, technically and legally it is not his and as such cannot be touched.

"Syria remained a friend and valued trading partner for all that time"

Really Jom? For all that time apart from the four occasions on which we have broken off diplomatic relations with Syria that is.

The people who HAVE been supplying Assad with all the support he needs, including chemicals, munitions, weapons, tanks, artillery, aircraft have been Russian and you Jom have not, off your own bat, singled them out and roundly condemned them once.

What gap left by the "West" Jom?

Right from the start I advocated active participation on the part of the USA, France and the UK to assist in the overthrow of Assad - care to tell me how that is "appeasement"? I agree 100% with you that had that been done right from the start then ISIS would never have appeared. How is that "appeasement"?