From Steve Shaw:

"We have both said that, in our opinion, Labour has addressed the issue appropriately. We have also pointed out your hypocrisy in dwelling obsessively on a matter that Labour has dealt with openly and honestly while the people you support, Farage and Johnson, get away without comment from you (except that you defended Johnson's calling black babies piccaninnies, of course 😂) with their scurrilous, xenophobic, racist agenda, replete with lies. I'd say that you have misrepresented us both. Labour addressed the matter seriously and both Jim and I, unlike you, have comprehensively given you our opinions in detail and have denied nothing"

1: Jom's opinion was that no problem ever existed. That wasn't true was it? Seeing as how we happen to have caught you in your "open & honest" mode.

2: Labour hasn't dealt with it "openly and honestly" though has it? No names named, no publication of the report that both you and Jom insists declares the Labour Party to be as pure as the driven snow. Yet the person they tasked with the investigation has detailed recommendations requiring immediate and sustained action by the NEC.

3: I'd love to see an example of this alleged support for Boris Johnson and his ill-advised, sarcastic and reprehensible remarks that I am supposed to have given. But like all your baseless allegations no such example will be forthcoming - that is the true reflection of how honest and open minded you are Shaw. (Note: No examples of - the lying and dissembling that we too often see here. I seem to spend half my time objecting to the deliberate and serious misrepresentations made by you, Teribus")