"Steve, you made two assertions.
That two prominent Labour worthies were "apologists for Israel" and that that debarred them from having any credible view on antisemitism.

Will you for once substantiate your wild assertions, as repeatedly asked."

The two people you non-randomly plucked out to make some long-lost point or other are indeed the kind of apologists for the Israeli regime (note the wording, please, and note how your quote in speech marks is different - a typical piece of dishonesty) that adhere to your discredited wider definition of antisemitism. Not a wild assertion. Bleedin' obvious to all but you. Secondly, nowhere have I said that anyone of any persuasion is debarred from commenting, whether they're Jews, not Jews, Labour, Tory or even you. Finally, once you've decided in that festering and puerile brainbox of yours that my assertions are "wild," well there isn't much point in my trying to counter your decision, is there? Well I just have done, of course. I must be mad. Now off you go and try to think up some more silly games. You're nothing if not bloody entertaining.