Continued.

Your Prof. Boyle piece is just ludicrous claims from someone who was not there.

Your Siegel piece says,
"That, I'm sure, turned out to be the mass grave."

It did not, and she saw no bodies and said nothing about graves in her original statements.

The Kahan Report is Israel's version of events, so what is your point?

Your Lamb piece is more ludicrous inventions from someone not there.

If there is anything significant in the massive Mason piece, please extract it. Was she there?

So you have still produced no evidence that contradicts Israel's version of events.