The EUMC "working definition" was reproduced in full on the EUMC website but never even "endorsed or adopted" by the EUMC, the EU or by anyone else connected, and for very good reasons. It was unceremoniously ditched by their successor in 2013, dropped like a hot potato, and quite right too. Just because you reproduce something on a website it doesn't mean you've endorsed it or adopted it. If the College of Policing wanted to endorse it or adopt it they would have said so. They are hardly pusillanimous about such things, are they? You can't get this right just like you can't get anything right. You, then your poodle bobad, doing his brainless copycat thing, both referred to the body as "the Police College" (he did a similar thing the other day when he reproduced somebody else's tweet verbatim, pretending it was his own thought). Well there are police colleges in the country, there to train people as members of the police force. The College of Policing is a professional association, nothing to do with training new bobbies, you clown. You didn't know the difference, did you, yet here you are making unsupported claims about their adopted policies. Busted, disgusting, can't be trusted.