The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #161005   Message #3823221
Posted By: beardedbruce
28-Nov-16 - 08:05 AM
Thread Name: BS: JFK not intended victim of Lee Harvey Oswald?
Subject: RE: BS: JFK not intended victim of Lee Harvey Oswald?
GregtrF,

"Which has fuck all to do with anything at all. "

You have made unsupported statements in other threads. I am trying to determine if you have any actual basis for your posts, or are just providing us with what YOU think we should be allowed to think.



Typical LIBERAL postings- make a comment, refuse to provide any supporting facts, and then complain when asked to provide some level of expertise on the subject you have made proclamations upon.


And of course your fellow supporters of that viewpoint have no criticism of this- THAT is reserved for those they disagree with, even when the opposing viewpoint provides both factual support and some degree of expertise.


Teribus,

All points to look at, but they apply to JFK as well- at that time, the level of security around the president was less than that of State Governors today. I remember being less than 25 feet from Nixon, at AAFB, and that was later.


As for you, Shaw, I fail to see that you have any grasp of reality, form your posts. GregtrF is the very symbol and source of shit around here.
" He's utterly devoid of bullshit, wordiness and diplomacy, all invaluable traits when it comes to dealing with some of the waffling bigots on this forum. This place would be a damn sight poorer without him. He's consistently right-minded."

Have YOU thought about treatment for your illusions? All he has shown is that he is utterly devoid of a factual basis for his statements and personnel attacks.