The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #160410   Message #3825067
Posted By: Keith A of Hertford
07-Dec-16 - 01:23 PM
Thread Name: BS: Labour party discussion
Subject: RE: BS: Labour party discussion
Naz Shah had already been reinstated when she said in Parliament that her statements were anti-Semitic, and acknowledged the role of Jewish friends who explained Jewish history to her.
But you are right. The NEC suspended her for her anti-Semitic statements and she had to retract and apologise for them.
She then went further in Parliament.
If you disagree with the NEC that her statements were anti-Semitic, it is your definition that is at fault.
They most likely work to the same definition as the Police, which is the EUMC definition that you refute Steve.
You are on your own in that.