Here is an example of a Jim Carroll lie and a total misrepresentation of fact:

"Where were you pair when your two mates were saying it was ok to sell Assad sniper ammunition, or riot control equipment or chemicals for weapons?"

The "two mates" he is referring to are myself and Keith A.

The lie is the statement where Csrroll says that I stated that "it was OK to sell Assad sniper ammunition, or riot control equipment or chemicals for weapons?"

Carroll will not come up with one whit of evidence in the shape of a direct verbatim quote of mine that says anything even remotely like that.

The misrepresentations:

1: No evidence at all that any ammunition was ever supplied by or from the UK that could have been used in Syria in the period March 2011 to the present day.

2: No recorded or reported instances have ever been put forward that any riot control equipment supplied by any UK company has ever killed anybody in Syria.

3: Definite evidence does exist in the form of the BIS investigation that shows no chemicals sold to Syria between 2004 and 2010 were ever used to manufacture chemical weapons

Most of Jim Carroll's posts are fiction based, biased, bigoted, racist drivel the content of which does not even stand up to even cursory common sense or logical scrutiny let alone detailed critical examination.