Stu read the following carefully:

"If anyone wishes to check back through this thread and many others you will find that I post a great deal less than you or the members of your little "clique", I very, very, rarely initiate threads and on the threads I do contribute to my posts are normally posts challenging (rather successfully) idiotic points put forward by you, or Steve Shaw, or Raggy, or Dave the Gnome. I challenge your point of view I do not, and am not, necessarily supporting the person, party, organisation or idea that you are opposing and objecting to.

Particularly that last sentence.

The big difference between us would seem to me you will condemn and act of supposition and things that you think MIGHT happen but HAVEN'T. I on the other hand will only do so if an offence has been committed. Judge on what men do not on what men say.