Yes, sorry all. It was introduced thus by Iains -

Does it mean Hansard should be banned because frequently politicians put a vicious spin on their responses in Parliament?

And I tried to point out that was false equivalence for all the reasons stated before. It was a side track and we should now forget it.

What is interesting though is that the question I had asked as to why the Guardian should be included in the ban was never answered. I gather from that there is little or no evidence of them purposely misreporting for political gain?

Cheers

DtG