That has always been known, Howard. Wikipedia is not and never has been a definitive source on anything which is why there are links to sources on anything it reports as factual. So you can look them up yourselves. Unlike the Daily Mail which puts forward opinion mixed with reporting as the true picture. The fact that some people do not check their sources is the whole point of removing the Daily Mail as a source. If the source cannot be relied on, neither can the fact. The linked Daily Mail article is just someone spitting their dummy out.

DtG