D the G. the thread was about the Daily mail being unreliable as a source of news:

It still is.

You look hard enough and many newspapers could be tarred with the same brush, either wholly or in part.

It's that 'wholly or in part' that is significant. Comparing chicken frogs in Montserrat to stirring up hate against migrants or Muslims is comparing apples to blue nosed baboons.. The editorial team of Wikipedia seem to agree. You do not. Ne'er the twain and all that.

Hansard was brought up by you. You have explained your comment. It is now a non issue.

DtG