"Operation Midland - Police inquiries closed with no charges being brought after it took 31 detectives 16 months to find absolutely nothing"
That's what I said - a cover up
""Potential" being the operative word. Article itself puts an estimated 750,000 males in the UK could possibly be interested in underaged sex."
Which is exatly what Keith said about Muslims and you have supported
Make up your mind - you can't reject one and accept the other
"irst paragraph of the article Jom states quite clearly that the man in question masqueraded as a Christian"
Many "Christians" pose as being such (Keith being a typical example), but sho no affinity to Christian beliefs - doesn't matter - they are officially Christians - they are certainly not Muslim.
The point of your argument is the dominance of Muslim Paedophelia
"All part and parcel of 1 above. Investigations wrapped up"
As above - the article points out that MI5 and the government were part of "not finding any evidence" on behaldf of leading members of the British establishments - what else were they going to claim?
NO evidence has ever been produced to link the Muslim religion with Paedophelia, yet you and Keith are claiming it here
Both ways again!!
THe 1970sw Paedophelia case was not part and parcel of the later case - to tally different and still unresolved and i=unpunished
The point of my putting these up was to show that paedophelia is a dominantly indigenous phenomenon and has nothing whatever to do with the Muslim religion or culture, as you are attempting to make it out to be by your use of a minute number of young criminals who have rejected their culture and adopted the British one.
Islam forbids sex outside marriage - these criminals openly indulge in it
Islam forbids alchohol - these criminals openly imbibe
THe actions of these (no more than a thousand) criminals spread all over Britain have nothing to do with being a Muslim.
Your attempting to claim otherwise makes you the racist you are.
Jim Carroll