The Mudcat Café TM
Thread #161452 Message #3841281
Posted By: Teribus
24-Feb-17 - 02:29 PM
Thread Name: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
Subject: RE: BS: Uk Labour Party discussion II
Now this IS going to be interesting, particularly as the people we will be discussing Shaw are people you:
a) Are not the least interested in
b) People you do not know
c) People whose work you do not know
Right then please explain this remark of yours "Never-a-true-word-will =pass-my-lips" Shaw
" The qualifying adjectives that he omitted to reproduce are crucial for accuracy."
Now let me see A.J.P.Taylor's work was described as being vulgar - vulgar in the sense that it was illiterate, it was tawdry, it was uneducated. It was not considered "vulgar" because it was full of dirty jokes.
Clark's work was considered largely fraudulent which is not surprising considering the man - he even admitted inventing the incident from which the work got it's title.
So tell us all what you mean by stating that " The qualifying adjectives that he omitted to reproduce are crucial for accuracy."
Crucial for the accuracy of what precisely liar?