"Jim I am sick of refuting your disgusting slurs"
They are not disgusting slurs - they are an analysis of your politics taken from your own statements,
People like you have no problem describing me as "leftie" or "member of a pack" or "liberal" used abusively
None of these are strictly accurate, and tthey are fairly commonplace, but I don't whinge about them - I try to refute them with arument (not threats of argument - like you)
The answer is simple - respond to arguments instead of acting as a mindless mouthpiece for the monsters you support
Did you not say what I claim you said about mass-murderer Breivik?
Do you not launch into an attack on homosexuals whenever the opportunity arises, long after the civilised world has moved on and embraced homosexuality as a natural human condition - have you not described them as disease carriers?
Did you not insist that refugees should be forced to wear identification tags long after even the gutter press had compared them to 'Jewish Yellow Stars"?
Have you not ceaselessly targeted refugees fleeing from wards Britain helped to start?
Did you not try to pass of Ann Coulter - the darling of the K.K.K., as a serious commentator on current affairs, using what she had to say as argument for the Thug you support?
Do you not continue to root for a man whose fascism fits the definition perfectly
DO YOU NOT IGNORE REQUESTS TO JUSTIFY THAT SUPPOORT BY RESPONDING TO WHAT HE IS DOING?
I make nothing up - I respond to what you say and what you refuse to say.
Feel free to produce any lie I have told - I don't lie - I don't see the point
Awkward arguments are not lies, they are merely inconvenient - take a look at what you say - it's what makes you what you are - not me, or anybody else
Jim Carroll