How do you know? How do you know whether they have evidence that he wasn't radicalised? Are you a senior member of the Met or a prison governor? Are you suggesting that he was radicalised without anyone noticing? What other conspiracy theories do you cling to? Maybe they know that he didn't mix with Islamists in prison or have any access to radicalising material. That would be good evidence that he wasn't radicalised. Unlike you and akenaton, they are sensible enough to know when a line of enquiry isn't worth pursuing and that the truth probably lies elsewhere, and they have publicly and unequivocally said so. I suggest that you adopt the approach and keep the dark insinuations to yourself. Of course, we know full well why you and akenaton like to cling to such things, don't we? "He was a Muslim, he did a bad thing, therefore he's an Islamic terrorist." You'd have made good lynch mob leaders, the pair of you.