When are you going to stop saying "enjoyment of property?" You do not "enjoy" a property you are not living in. If the place was so bloody enjoyable you'd live in it. Those empty properties, worth big mazumas in London of course, are investments. I live in a seaside town that is replete with "properties" that are empty for eleven months out of twelve. The people who own them, as well as the people who own those "properties" in lucrative London, already enjoy their human rights in their main residences, which you can bet your life are not in dangerous tower blocks. How you can set the kinds of "human rights" enjoyed by people who mop up homes for investment and keep them empty alongside the humanitarian disaster delivered by the fire - well, I don't know what planet you're on, frankly.