I'll patiently point out to you, Iains, that you started this thread with a raging polemic against Jeremy Corbyn. Your first post made no reference to the practicalities or legalities of what Corbyn was suggesting might happen. It was a vicious attack on his personality and integrity from a dyed-in-the-wool Tory. After a number of posts which all condemned the inhumane nature of your rant and which pointed to the fact that you were blatantly protecting the very rich from attack, you tried to save face by switching your argument to the impracticalities/illegalities of Corbyn's suggestion. That represented a far greater piece of snake-twisting than what you accused Corbyn of. You lost tbe argument, you were sorely embarrassed, so, instead of backing down like a man you tried to change the subject. No bluster this end, no bullying from me, just pointing out what any sane person reading this thread can easily see for himself or herself.