I agree with Amergin.

If there are people who want BOTH options, we should work toward creative solutions that achieve consensus, not settle for a majority vote. If all things Mudcat were decided by majority vote, it would be a far different place. Persisting to consensus builds community, opens minds to new approaches, and reflects how human beings actually think when the atmosphere is safe enough-- which is to keep problem-solving till solutions fit right for the whole group.

Democracy is a fine thing. But when consensus can be achieved, it's better.

~Susan