What's up with you!

This:

https://inforrm.org/2018/10/27/lord-hain-and-privilege-when-power-wealth-and-abuse-combine-to-subvert-the-rule-of-law-paul-wragg

"

The House of Lords adopted a resolution on sub judice on 11 May 2000. The resolution, as amended, is as follows:
“That, subject to the discretion of the Lord Speaker, and to the right of the House to legislate on any matter or to discuss any delegated legislation, the House in all its proceedings (including proceedings of committees of the House) shall apply the following rules on matters sub judice:
(1) Cases in which proceedings are active in United Kingdom courts shall not be referred to in any motion, debate or question. …
(b) (i) Civil proceedings are active when arrangements for the hearing, such as setting down a case for trial, have been made, until the proceedings are ended by judgment or discontinuance.
(ii) Any application made in or for the purposes of any civil proceedings shall be treated as a distinct proceeding.
(c) Appellate proceedings, whether criminal or civil, are active from the time when they are commenced by application for leave to appeal or by notice of appeal until ended by judgment or discontinuance.”

I wonder where that leaves Lord Hain?