"If a law doesn't include all it needs removing not defending and when cases like this arise they need exposing"

The fact you do not like a particular law is not going to change it.
You probably do not like the fact Tommy Robinson was released from his bail conditions today.
You could invert your argument and ask: Why was Robinson jailed for alleged contempt while Hain is allowed to skulk behind Parliamentary privilege. It is merely your opinion that the law is non inclusive. The law lords would shit allover your argument.
As has been said many times only Parliament can change laws not a posturing bog dweller.

By the way I do not talk down to people. If what I say makes you feel inferior perhaps you should change the way you think.

Still awaiting your evidence to demonstrate you are not a liar, bluster don't hack it!