Jim said what he said, my last reference was to the existence and circulation of the stories, not who posted them
They have proved years of a barrier to discussing the work and ideas we evolved in the Critics Group
Such discussions seldom get belong 'name changes' and 'war records'
Your dismissal of my story and suggestion that it inappropriate echoes Jim's last abusive message in which he describes Ewan as "condescending, precious and intolerant." - must have been a different feller than the one I knew
As with comments you have made in the past about disagreements I have had with others, your objection would have carried far more weight had it been accompanied by criticism of Jim's abusive attitude towards me and a scurrilously inaccurate attack on someone who hasn't been been around for three decades to answer for himself
Somewhat tunnel-visioned and one sided - again

I really have finished with this Vic - you have drawn far more attention to Bob's behaviour here than I ever wanted to
Let's leave there and deal with the more fruitful possibilities of this discussion - waddya say ?
Jim