The idea that having the title of "prince" would make them more safe though is nonsense. Just because someone says it is so in an interview does not make it fact. They either have the security paid for them or they don't - regardless as to if Archie is a prince or not. It doesn't even make sense!! Harry is a prince so if being a prince guaranteed they didn't have to pay for their own protection then they already would have that guarantee - irrespective of Archie's lack of a title. Re this story from almost 10 years ago in connection with general security not being provided out of the public purse for royals apart from the very nearest to the throne. Seriously if folks in the US who have watched this programme think the couple should get free round the clock protection then why don't they crowd fund it instead of somehow implying people in the UK are bigoted for not providing it???
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/angry-prince-andrew-pay-three-778240