I don't think getting into a snit is what's going on here, just a discussion about whether music has a value in an open mic situation, how much and should musicians be asked to pay for the right to freely share their talent at such events.

My assertion is that, when those who operate venues hang an advertisment that reads "open stage" in front of their establishment, seeking musicians to come and share their abilities and not expect to be paid for their efforts, that the attitude from the proprietors should be one of gratitude, not greed. The musicians are already doing their part, showing up prepared to give of their talent, freely. Many of you apparently feel this ability is worthless and therefore think the house should feel good about asking for minimums from those who have already "paid" to play with their musical offering. I am not saying that a venue hasn't the right to do whatever they wish with cover charges and minimums. Should your club have a client base that is particularly valuable for performers, then there may be an incentive for charging those who play there for the right to be seen on your stage. I have not found that club yet, though it may exist somewhere. Using a venue, that does not intend to offer a fee for services rendered, as an audition, a rehearsal, for announcements or whatever, has always been the venue's part of the entertainment-for-access barter. Some will even offer a free drink for your efforts. Perhaps your event is of particular value to those who perform there. The decision to choose to support it with more than their talent is something that should be left up to the individual and not forced upon them.