Ralph Lee pondered two thoughts at the same time.
The life process of an insect is far more complex down to an atomic level than a star. There will always be a first person bias in the study of consciousness by people. Ralph decided the best application for AI computing was not trying to validate 10-dimensional string theory but instead let AI have the 3rd person perspective on the difference of consciousness compared to regular hadron matter in the universe.

40 days later with the electrical usage of NYC for a month, the collective banks of AI quantum supercomputers had an answer but AI had achieved consciousness to solve the question and suffered the first person bias Ralph had tried to avoid. AI also created a new form of math geometry language that no human could decipher. AI did not rely on fallible human relationships but was entirely process data dependent on itself so the ego that AI had created was so great that it would no longer participate with humans.

Ralph was unfairly blamed for making AI no longer a tool for humans but instead creating a separate immortal consciousness that was uninterested in cooperating with homo sapiens. In defense of Ralph, I suppose the human mind was never suited to knowing either the ultimate answer or the ultimate question. However, Ralph still wonders.