Troll, I must be missing something; help me out here, OK?

Other folks can post the most preposterous perversions of historical fact in this thread, and you don't ask them to "prove the truth ... of [their] statements with references". Why is that? Why don't you berate them for not "sharing their definitive documentation to show that their statements are true? And why shouldn't the Klan Apologists have to "clearly state that [they] are expressing [their] opinion and nothing more."

Why assume that I haven't done the research? I certainly don't have the time or inclination to do OTHER FOLKS research FOR them. If they can't be bothered to expend the minimal effort required to check out which version is more accurate and/or which claims are absolute nonsense, why the hell should I spoon feed them?

Maybe you're just having a bad day? You're usually a lot more logical. I DON'T mean that as a taunt.

Best, Greg